Independent research. Rigorous methodology. Open science.
Open Questions
The framework's known unknowns. What's actively being tested, what's
a known mechanism gap, what reach hasn't yet landed cleanly. A framework
that knows what it doesn't know is more trustworthy than one that
pretends to know everything.
Each question below links to the relevant entry where the question is
treated in detail — typically a pre-registered prediction, a research note
documenting the gap, or a paper-status entry naming what's pending.
Questions are open by definition; their resolution arrives via tests,
audits, or new derivations and gets documented in a future entry. The
audit trail IS the record.
Pre-registered predictions awaiting test
Predictions with locked confirmation/falsification thresholds. The result lands wherever it lands.
Does the joint 7-vector emerge from coupled-cavity drive?
Test JJ Phase 1 currently running on Hetzner. Pre-registered confirmation: cos-distance ≥ 0.15 at boundary drives with non-monotonic signature.
Does the C60 fullerene battery show 6 quantized charge states at 0.45 V spacing?
Cheap to test (~$1-3K at any battery-research lab). Confirmation: 6 reduction peaks at 0.45 V ± 0.05 V step spacing, with >10⁸× tunneling suppression vs spherical control.
Decadal timescale (superheavy nucleus synthesis is current-frontier work). Framework's Pentanacci prediction converges with shell-model 'island of stability' conjecture — same integer from two unrelated frameworks.
Specific places where the framework's mechanism is incomplete and the framework operator knows it.
How does the cipher read the cooling phase (|t)?
Current cipher reads f (accumulation/peak) cleanly but not |t (cooling/reorganization). This is what limits the framework's energetic-scale predictions (T2 blind test scored 33% within an order of magnitude). Adding the |t read is the next cipher development.
What is the canonical third configuration in 4D triality?
Framework predicts cycle-2 dimensions come in triplets (matter / antimatter / emergent third) per the 24-cell's third-orbit. Candidate identifications: glass, quasicrystals, tunneling intermediate, superconductivity, H-embrittlement intermediate. Not yet pinned down which (if any) is canonical.
What is the quantitative formula for galactic-scale geometric amplification?
Dark-matter alternative hypothesis is qualitatively in place (apex-bearing galactic geometries amplify gravitational coupling) but lacks a quantitative formula matching rotation-curve observations.
Where the framework's reach into cosmology has not yet landed cleanly.
Can TLT explain the Hubble tension within < ~1% without fitting?
Currently at ~4 percentage points without fitting — suggestive but not supportive at the framework's usual precision (1% on magic numbers). Needs cleaner prescription for dimensional read at SH0ES distances.
Does the 256³ pulsed simulation produce grid-independent universe-birth perturbation amplitude?
Paper 7 release depends on this. First 256³ run completing in ~2-3 days. Confirmation: 256³ amplitude in (0.8 to 1.2) × 10⁻⁶ and within 15% of 128³ amplitude.
Does the 'pulse never stopped' thesis produce observed cosmic-expansion history?
Framework's dark-energy alternative claims acceleration is the cosmic-vs-local framerate mismatch. Specific quantitative prediction of expansion-rate history not yet derived.
Will quasi-CN=7 elements other than gallium show the same anomaly pattern?
Framework predicts Mn allotropes, Am variants should show wide-liquid-range + contraction-on-melting matching gallium. Quantitative cross-element comparison not yet done.
Can the cycle-restart π-scaling between cycles be derived from first principles, or is it observed only?
The approximate π scaling between adjacent cycles' analogous slots is empirical. The Tribonacci framework gives sharper per-cycle derivation but doesn't yet derive the inter-cycle π factor.