Open Questions

The framework's known unknowns. What's actively being tested, what's a known mechanism gap, what reach hasn't yet landed cleanly. A framework that knows what it doesn't know is more trustworthy than one that pretends to know everything.

Each question below links to the relevant entry where the question is treated in detail — typically a pre-registered prediction, a research note documenting the gap, or a paper-status entry naming what's pending. Questions are open by definition; their resolution arrives via tests, audits, or new derivations and gets documented in a future entry. The audit trail IS the record.

Pre-registered predictions awaiting test

Predictions with locked confirmation/falsification thresholds. The result lands wherever it lands.

Is 184 the next nuclear magic number beyond 126?

Decadal timescale (superheavy nucleus synthesis is current-frontier work). Framework's Pentanacci prediction converges with shell-model 'island of stability' conjecture — same integer from two unrelated frameworks.

Known mechanism gaps

Specific places where the framework's mechanism is incomplete and the framework operator knows it.

How does the cipher read the cooling phase (|t)?

Current cipher reads f (accumulation/peak) cleanly but not |t (cooling/reorganization). This is what limits the framework's energetic-scale predictions (T2 blind test scored 33% within an order of magnitude). Adding the |t read is the next cipher development.

What is the canonical third configuration in 4D triality?

Framework predicts cycle-2 dimensions come in triplets (matter / antimatter / emergent third) per the 24-cell's third-orbit. Candidate identifications: glass, quasicrystals, tunneling intermediate, superconductivity, H-embrittlement intermediate. Not yet pinned down which (if any) is canonical.

Cosmological open questions

Where the framework's reach into cosmology has not yet landed cleanly.

Can TLT explain the Hubble tension within < ~1% without fitting?

Currently at ~4 percentage points without fitting — suggestive but not supportive at the framework's usual precision (1% on magic numbers). Needs cleaner prescription for dimensional read at SH0ES distances.

Application gaps

Predictions that need experimental builds, not just theory.

Biological extensions (Paper 9 territory)

Where the framework's reach into biology has been claimed but not quantitatively confirmed.

Does the {7}-fold self-resonance explain ATP synthase, GroEL, proteasome rotor preferences?

Qualitative connection via HPC-039. Quantitative match (does the rotor frequency match the cavity self-resonance?) is open.

Methodology and discipline questions

Questions about how the framework knows what it knows.

Can the cycle-restart π-scaling between cycles be derived from first principles, or is it observed only?

The approximate π scaling between adjacent cycles' analogous slots is empirical. The Tribonacci framework gives sharper per-cycle derivation but doesn't yet derive the inter-cycle π factor.