Independent research. Rigorous methodology. Open science.
Quality control. Every audit names what it audits, lists findings with severity, and tracks resolution status. Internal contrarian reviews, external AI audits, cross-version cipher comparisons, and the correction trails that surface when something has to change.
Audits are the framework's immune system. Some audits are internal: "play the skeptic and tear this apart." Some are external: ship the same data to Gemini and Grok and see where independent eyes land. Some are version audits: cipher v9 vs v11 vs v12 across the same 107-element bench. Every audit publishes its findings with severity and resolution.
The cipher framework has gone through versions v7 through v12 (with v10 discarded). This audit lays out the version chain on a single 107-element bench so anyone evaluating the cipher knows which version is canonical and what each version contributed. Canonical version: v12. Pure terrain, no correct...
This is a meta-audit on the cycle-specific recurrence framework that replaced the universal Fibonacci/8 formula for dimensional c-values. The audit question: was this a *refinement* (allowed by the framework's discipline) or a *correction* (forbidden)? Resolution: refinement. Five findings support t...
This audit documents the framework's external AI audit protocol. At each major milestone (cipher version release, c-ladder refinement, paper publication, Test JJ launch), an audit package goes to two or more state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini, Grok, cross-model) for independent review. Why external AI au...
This cross-paper audit assesses revision status for all 9 framework papers in response to recent refinements (Tribonacci correction, cipher v9→v12, magic numbers, non-Euclidean discovery, internal geometry). Status-note discipline applied to all 9 papers. Every paper has an explicit status note at /...
This audit closes the loop on the c-ladder correction. The research note explains *what* changed (cycle-specific recurrence engines replace a universal Fibonacci/8 formula for dims 4-6). The audit checks *whether the historical record is clean* now that the correction is adopted — stale sources tagg...
Before launching Test JJ Phase 1 at scale, a pre-launch contrarian audit examined six potential methodological issues that could produce false confirmations or false failures: # Concern Resolution C1 Aperture-coupling Phase 0 falsification might be topology-specific, not hypothesis-wide Test 3...
Four blind prediction tests were conducted March–April 2026. "Blind" means the framework operator did not have access to the answer data at prediction time; predictions were submitted in writing before the answer set was revealed. Results: Test Scope Score T1 Crystal structure (CN + lattice) fo...