HPC-034: DESIGNED GEOMETRIES — RESULTS
================================================================================
Date: 2026-04-04
Author: Jonathan Shelton (theory), Claude (computation)
Status: COMPLETED — 15 geometries tested
================================================================================

FUSION CONFINEMENT:
  24-cell projection: coherence=0.995 (near perfect), concentration=0.0x
  Torus (tokamak): concentration=11,039x (!), coherence=0.139 (terrible)
  70.53° rhombohedron: Q=34.3 (highest), coherence=0.236, concentration=0.1x

  KEY FINDING: Concentration and coherence are OPPOSING in single geometries.
  The torus focuses massively but destroys phase alignment.
  The 24-cell maintains perfect coherence but doesn't focus.
  Optimal fusion = COMPOUND geometry: torus concentration + 24-cell coherence.
  Internal baffles at 70.53° inside a toroidal vessel?

SUPERCONDUCTOR CANDIDATES:
  Truncated cube (A1): coherence=1.000 (PERFECT). But 1 mode, no doublet.
  The doublet may not resolve at this grid/step count.
  Need higher resolution or longer runs to see the beat frequency.

MAGNET CANDIDATES:
  Mixed-void BCC (B2): ONLY geometry with a doublet (gap=0.968).
  Wider gap than Fe (0.958). Coherence=0.912. The alternating sphere
  sizes in BCC DID create the two-timing-family structure.
  Prediction: stronger magnetic trap than pure Fe.

CONDUCTOR CANDIDATES:
  2D hexagonal sheet (C1): Q=34.7 (2x higher than 3D references).
  Coherence=0.642. Concentration=3.2x. The 2D geometry creates
  sharper resonance as predicted. 2D > 3D for transport.

OUTPUT-AGNOSTIC. DATA SHOWS WHAT IT SHOWS.
================================================================================