--- id: test-jj-prism-extended-2026-05-14 type: test title: Test JJ Prism-Extended — Prism-Family Chebyshev Lock date_published: 2026-05-14 date_updated: 2026-05-14 project: geometric_wave_compute status: confirmed log_subtype: experiment_complete tags: [test-jj, prism-class, chebyshev, drive-invariant, coupled-pair, gwc, fdtd, prism-7fold, prism-11fold, prism-13fold] author: Jonathan Shelton predicts: - prism-class-spectral-lock - chebyshev-attractor-2cos2pi-N data_supporting: - hpc-039-heptagonal-resonance - test-jj-joint-emergence-prereg --- ## TL;DR GWC Test JJ phase-1 advanced from 341 → 606 of 700 configurations between 2026-05-13 and 2026-05-14, closing the prism_7fold near_field gap and adding full prism_11fold + partial prism_13fold pair-coverage. **The single-cavity {7}-uniqueness of [HPC-039](/research/tests/hpc-039-heptagonal-resonance.html) generalizes to a prism-family Chebyshev attractor at the coupled-pair scale.** Each prism over-represents its own `2·cos(2π/N)` ratio; each prism shows a drive-and-decoherence-invariant joint-spectrum envelope of comparable tightness: | Pair | n | BW std/mean (pooled) | BW std/mean (near_field) | |---|---:|---:|---:| | prism_7fold × prism_7fold | 150 | 4.4 % | **2.8 %** (tightest in dataset) | | prism_11fold × prism_11fold | 150 | 4.9 % | **2.9 %** | | prism_13fold × prism_13fold | 56 / 150 | 7.1 % | (partial) | | octahedron × octahedron | 175 | 75.6 % (compare) | — | | bicone × bicone | 150 | 59.2 % (compare) | — | ## Headline findings - **Prism family is a Chebyshev attractor.** The dominant joint-spectrum ratio is `2·cos(2π/N)` (second-order Chebyshev), generic across N. Earlier "{7}-fold Fibonacci attractor" framing is superseded. - **prism_11fold near_field is a new compute primitive** — 12 GHz wideband locked (2.9 % CV), 25-peak high-density modulator. Distinct from the narrowband prism_7fold near_field clock primitive and the high-entropy octa near_field modulator. - **prism_13fold may be entering a Bessel/cylinder asymptotic regime** — its first-order Chebyshev `2·cos(2π/13) = 1.942` is *suppressed* (0.70 %) below octa baseline 1.41 %. PROVISIONAL pending the remaining 94 of 150 configs (Hetzner phase-1 ETA late 2026-05-14). - **bicone shared_wall hidden BW lock** — pooled 4.0 % CV, comparable to a 7-fold prism, masked in pooled-shape views. ## Math correction The 2026-05-13 comprehensive doc labeled the dominant ratio `2·cos(π/7) = 1.247`. The correct label is **`2·cos(2π/7)`** — `2·cos(π/7) ≈ 1.802` is a different number entirely. Minimal polynomial for `2·cos(2π/7)` is `x³ + x² − 2x − 1 = 0`. The phenomenon (over-representation of the value 1.247) is real; only the symbolic identification was wrong. Propagated to the GWC `tests/` corpus and the GWC bibliography. ## What this means for the framework - HPC-039's single-cavity {7}-uniformity result still holds as a single-cavity property. Coupled-pair behavior generalizes. - Cipher v3 circuit-language Layer 1 should add a PRISM-CLASS family with `bw_lock_cv` as a new readout, rather than proliferating N-specific FRUSTRATE archetypes. - {7} is *first* in the cycle (lowest odd-prime frustration overtone), not *unique* across it. Biology's preferential use of {7}-fold rotational machines (ATP synthase, GroEL, proteasome) becomes an open question for [Paper 9](/research/paper-status/paper-9-status-2026-05.html). ## Source Findings doc and reproducibility artifacts are in the GWC project tree: - Findings: `geometric_wave_compute/tests/test_jj_prism_extended_2026-05-14.md` - Dataframe: `geometric_wave_compute/data/2026_05_14_pull/jj_fingerprints.pkl` (681 records) - Build/analysis scripts: `geometric_wave_compute/data/2026_05_14_pull/{build_dataframe.py,analyze.py}` The frequency-ratio analysis is in `analysis/ratios.json`; the shape × topology cuts are in `analysis/cuts.json`. ## Status **Confirmed for prism_7fold, prism_11fold.** Provisional for prism_13fold pending full sample (~94 more configurations finishing on Hetzner late 2026-05-14). Bicone shared_wall hidden lock confirmed at the coupled-pair scale.