This is a pre-registered prediction for the Test JJ Phase 1 joint-7-vector search. Pre-registration ensures the success criteria are locked before the experimental result is observed, eliminating the possibility of post-hoc threshold adjustment.
\nThe framework predicts that the seven foundational geometric expressions (CONCENTRATE, DISTRIBUTE, RADIATE, POLARIZE, TRIANGULATE, CUBIFY, FRUSTRATE) should *compose* when geometries couple \u2014 producing a joint spectral fingerprint distinct from the sum of two independent single-cavity fingerprints. Test JJ Phase 1 puts that prediction in front of three coupling topologies (aperture, shared_wall, near_field) and a decoh teeter-totter (0.10/0.50 \u2192 0.30/0.30 \u2192 0.50/0.10).
\nA prior attempt to detect this emergence in aperture-coupling alone was falsified. Phase 1 expands to three topologies so the question is settled across the coupling landscape.
\nJoint emergence is detected when:
\nsum of single-cavity fingerprints (i.e., the coupled run is *materially* different from the linear superposition).
\ndecoh teeter-totter (drive imbalance) but NOT at symmetric drive (0.30/0.30) \u2014 the non-monotonic signature.
\ntopologies but NOT for the near_field control.
\nConfirmed if (all of): 1. cos-distance \u2265 0.15 at (0.10/0.50) AND/OR (0.50/0.10) in aperture or shared_wall topology. 2. cos-distance \u2264 0.08 at (0.30/0.30) symmetric drive (the \"joint mode vanishes at balance\" non-monotonic signature). 3. cos-distance \u2264 0.10 in the near_field control across all decoh ratios (the \"no joint mode in uncoupled control\" signature).
\nPartially confirmed if (any of):
\nsignature is partially visible.
\nother is null (suggests topology-dependent emergence \u2014 still a finding).
\nFalsified if (any of):
\nratios (no joint emergence detected at this scale).
\nlinear mixing, not non-monotonic emergence).
\namplitude to aperture/shared_wall (suggests artifact, not real emergence).
\nA joint-7-vector that exists only at specific drive imbalances is the framework's *prediction*. Linear mixing of two cavity modes would produce a *monotonic* response to drive balance \u2014 peaking at one extreme or the other but smoothly varying. A real joint emergence should appear at imbalance, vanish at balance, and reappear at the opposite imbalance \u2014 the teeter-totter signature.
\nThis is what distinguishes a genuine framework-confirming result from a mundane linear-mixing observation. If Phase 1 produces a *monotonic* response (even a large-amplitude one), the framework's specific claim is *not* confirmed; what's confirmed is linear coupling, which is uninteresting.
\nAperture coupling Phase 0 was falsified at slightly different thresholds than initially considered. Test JJ Phase 1 needs the thresholds locked *before* the results land, so post-hoc claims of \"oh, the emergence was at 0.12 cos-distance instead of 0.15, that still counts\" can't be made.
\nThe thresholds in this entry are the official ones. They will not be revised retroactively. The experimental result either lands in the confirmed window, the partially-confirmed window, the falsified window, or somewhere outside all three (ambiguous result).
\n~60% of the (topology \u00d7 decoh) grid is complete.
\nbelow 0.10 across all completed configurations.
\n(need the full grid + statistical confidence intervals).
\ncompletes.
\nPre-registered prediction for Test JJ Phase 1 joint-7-vector search, filed 2026-05-09.
\nThe claim: the joint-7-vector emerges from coupled-cavity drive when (1) cos-distance \u2265 0.15 from linear superposition at drive imbalance, (2) the non-monotonic teeter-totter signature is visible (emergence vanishes at symmetric drive), and (3) the near_field control is null (cos-distance \u2264 0.10).
\nConfirmed window:
\nFalsified window:
\nWhy the non-monotonic signature matters: linear mixing produces a monotonic response; real joint emergence should appear at imbalance, vanish at balance, reappear at the opposite imbalance. This distinguishes the framework's specific claim from generic linear coupling.
\nStatus: open. Phase 1 ~60% complete on Hetzner. Preliminary indication: cos-distance clustering below 0.10 (suggestive of falsification but not conclusive). Full grid result will fall in one of the four pre-registered windows.
\nPre-registration locks thresholds so post-hoc adjustment is impossible. The result either lands where it lands.
", "see_also": [ "test-jj-phase1-coupled-cavity", "aperture-coupling-falsified" ], "cited_by": [ "test-jj-pre-launch-contrarian-audit" ], "attachments": [], "schema_version": "1.0", "generated_at": "2026-05-12T03:27:18.533879Z" }