{ "schema_version": "1.0", "generated_at": "2026-05-12T03:27:18.533879Z", "type": "audit", "count": 7, "entries": [ { "id": "cipher-version-progression-audit", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 Cipher Version Progression (v7 \u2192 v8 \u2192 v9 \u2192 v11 \u2192 v12)", "status": "confirmed", "project": "cipher_v12", "date_published": "2026-05-12", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "cipher", "version-history", "v7", "v8", "v9", "v11", "v12", "no-corrections" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "cross_version_audit", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/cipher-version-progression-audit.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/cipher-version-progression-audit.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/cipher-version-progression-audit.json", "summary_excerpt": "The cipher framework has gone through versions v7 through v12 (with v10 discarded). This audit lays out the version chain on a single 107-element bench so anyone evaluating the cipher knows which version is canonical and what each version contributed.\nCanonical version: v12. Pure terrain, no correct..." }, { "id": "tribonacci-refinement-audit", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 Tribonacci Refinement (Meta-Audit on Cycle-Specific Framework)", "status": "confirmed", "project": "cipher_v12", "date_published": "2026-05-12", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "tribonacci", "cycle-specific", "refinement-vs-correction", "meta-audit", "framework-discipline" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "framework_refinement_audit", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/tribonacci-refinement-audit.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/tribonacci-refinement-audit.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/tribonacci-refinement-audit.json", "summary_excerpt": "This is a meta-audit on the cycle-specific recurrence framework that replaced the universal Fibonacci/8 formula for dimensional c-values. The audit question: was this a *refinement* (allowed by the framework's discipline) or a *correction* (forbidden)?\nResolution: refinement. Five findings support t..." }, { "id": "external-ai-audit-protocol", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 External AI Audit Protocol (Gemini / Grok / Cross-Model)", "status": "active", "project": "framework_quality_control", "date_published": "2026-05-12", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "external-review", "gemini", "grok", "ai-audit", "cross-model", "independent-eyes", "methodology" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "external_audit_protocol", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/external-ai-audit-protocol.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/external-ai-audit-protocol.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/external-ai-audit-protocol.json", "summary_excerpt": "This audit documents the framework's external AI audit protocol. At each major milestone (cipher version release, c-ladder refinement, paper publication, Test JJ launch), an audit package goes to two or more state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini, Grok, cross-model) for independent review.\nWhy external AI au..." }, { "id": "paper-revision-sync-audit", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 Paper Revision Sync Status (May 2026)", "status": "active", "project": "paper_revisions", "date_published": "2026-05-12", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "paper-revisions", "sync-status", "status-note-approach", "paper-1", "paper-2", "paper-5" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "cross_paper_audit", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/paper-revision-sync-audit.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/paper-revision-sync-audit.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/paper-revision-sync-audit.json", "summary_excerpt": "This cross-paper audit assesses revision status for all 9 framework papers in response to recent refinements (Tribonacci correction, cipher v9\u2192v12, magic numbers, non-Euclidean discovery, internal geometry).\nStatus-note discipline applied to all 9 papers. Every paper has an explicit status note at /..." }, { "id": "c-ladder-correction-trail", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 c-Ladder Correction Trail (Fibonacci \u2192 Tribonacci)", "status": "confirmed", "project": "cipher_v12", "date_published": "2026-05-11", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "cipher", "c-ladder", "Tribonacci", "correction-trail", "stale-tagging" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "internal_audit", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/c-ladder-correction-trail.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/c-ladder-correction-trail.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/c-ladder-correction-trail.json", "summary_excerpt": "This audit closes the loop on the c-ladder correction. The research note explains *what* changed (cycle-specific recurrence engines replace a universal Fibonacci/8 formula for dims 4-6). The audit checks *whether the historical record is clean* now that the correction is adopted \u2014 stale sources tagg..." }, { "id": "test-jj-pre-launch-contrarian-audit", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 Test JJ Pre-Launch Contrarian Review", "status": "confirmed", "project": "gwc_test_jj", "date_published": "2026-05-05", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "test-jj", "contrarian", "pre-launch", "methodology-check", "falsifiability" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "pre_launch_contrarian", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/test-jj-pre-launch-contrarian-audit.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/test-jj-pre-launch-contrarian-audit.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/test-jj-pre-launch-contrarian-audit.json", "summary_excerpt": "Before launching Test JJ Phase 1 at scale, a pre-launch contrarian audit examined six potential methodological issues that could produce false confirmations or false failures:\n\n\n#\nConcern\nResolution\n\n\n\nC1\nAperture-coupling Phase 0 falsification might be topology-specific, not hypothesis-wide\nTest 3..." }, { "id": "four-blind-tests-audit", "type": "audit", "title": "Audit \u2014 Four Blind Prediction Tests (T1 50%, T2 33%, T3 80%, T4 100%)", "status": "confirmed", "project": "cipher_v12", "date_published": "2026-04-04", "date_updated": "2026-05-12", "tags": [ "audit", "blind-test", "predictive-accuracy", "geometry-strong", "energetics-weak" ], "author": "Jonathan Shelton", "log_subtype": "blind_prediction_audit", "url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/audits/four-blind-tests-audit.html", "source_markdown_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/research/_src/audits/four-blind-tests-audit.md.txt", "json_url": "https://prometheusresearch.tech/api/entries/four-blind-tests-audit.json", "summary_excerpt": "Four blind prediction tests were conducted March\u2013April 2026. \"Blind\" means the framework operator did not have access to the answer data at prediction time; predictions were submitted in writing before the answer set was revealed.\nResults:\n\n\nTest\nScope\nScore\n\n\n\nT1\nCrystal structure (CN + lattice) fo..." } ] }